|
Court No.040949372Q1
COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF ALBERTA
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON
BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn subordinate
Officer(s) acting in Her Majesty’s name
(Trustee)
Respondents
(Trustees)
-and-
: colin : jones
Sentient human being, Heir, Successor as
Signatory of the
Sovereign assini watchi neiyawak separate
and distinct
Indigenous Peoples to Friendship Treaties
(for the mutual
benefits for trade and commerce),
The Peace Treaties (to
keep secure the trade and commerce), and Numbered
Treaties (entrusting the Sovereign Territories
to Her
Majesty), made with Queen Victoria, Her Heir(s) and
Successor(s) as Queen Elizabeth II, Her
Heir(s), Successor(s)
and Predecessor(s)
(Beneficiary)
Applicant
(Beneficiary)
_________________________________________
NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS
_________________________________________
TAKE NOTICE, that the Applicant (Beneficiary),
will bring a notice
of constitutional questions before
the presiding justice in regular
chambers, Law Courts, #1 Sir Winston
Churchill Square, Edmonton,
Alberta, on the 23rd day
of November, 2004 at 10:00 A.M., in the
forenoon or so thereafter as the Applicant
(Beneficiary) and council for
the respondent (Trustee) may be heard
for, an agreed upon date for
special chambers for the Applicant
(Beneficiary) notice of constitutional questions.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS
TO BE ASKED ARE
1. Does the forced appearance of the Applicant a Beneficiary and Signatory to a court of a subordinate
Governing structure, a Trustee to the aforementioned Beneficiary and Signatory constitute a breach of s. 25(A) of the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982)?
2.
Does the forced appearance of the Applicant a Beneficiary and Signatory to a court of an Alien Governing structure, a Trustee
to the aforementioned Beneficiary and Signatory constitute a breach of the contract of ratification, dated the 2nd
day of April 1879?
3. Does the forced appearance of the
Applicant a Beneficiary and Signatory to a court of an Alien Governing structure, a Trustee to the aforementioned Beneficiary
and Signatory constitute a breach of the Trust made by adhesion, on the 18th day of September, 1878, by actions
of the secondary Trustee (Her Majesty’s Loyal sworn subordinate Officer(s)), in dereliction of sworn duty to Her Majesty,
committing acts of conspired treason against Her Majesty?
4. Does the contract of ratification, dated the 2nd day of April 1879, protect the Applicant,
a Beneficiary and Signatory, of an Alien jurisdiction such as this forum?
5.
Does the Trust made by adhesion, dated the 18th day of September 1878, protect the Applicant a Beneficiary and
Signatory, of an Alien jurisdiction such as this forum?
6. Does the Royal Proclamation (1763)
protect the Applicant, a Beneficiary and Signatory to the Trust and any and all of the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples
referred to as NATIONS AND TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA INDIANS, of an Alien jurisdiction such as this forum?
7. Does Her Majesty’s Order(s) dated the 28th
day of June, 1985, protect the Applicant, a Beneficiary and Signatory and any and all of the separate and distinct Indigenous
Peoples referred to as NATIONS AND TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA INDIANS, the Applicant a Beneficiary and Signatory and the Beneficiaries
to the Trusts, of an Alien jurisdiction such as this forum?
8. Does Geo. III, c.138 1803 protect any and all of the separate and distinct Indigenous Peoples referred to as NATIONS
AND TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA INDIANS, the Applicant a Beneficiary and Signatory and the Beneficiaries to the Trusts from the
Governing structures of the Federal, Provincial or Municipal Governments?
9. Can a Trustee have a
negative effect on its Beneficiaries without having 100 percent of the Beneficiaries knowledge and un-coerced consent?
10. Does the commanding of the Applicant to appear under
duress into this Alien jurisdiction constitute a form of genocide?
The infringement
|
